What should go in our engineering notebook?
The engineering notebook, while optional, should reflect the team's personality and branding . It should cover what needs to be included and decisions about its overall structure and individual sections .
Key elements to include in the notebook are:
- Building Section and Documenting the Robot This section should explain how the robot fulfills the challenge and the driving factors behind its construction . It should contain information about parts and materials, pictures of every mechanism with captions, and explanations of components to illustrate design thought processes . Graphics such as CAD screenshots or real-world photos are generally preferred over high-quality renders, and each graphic must have a caption or explanation . Math should be used in explanations to target the Think award . The notebook should tell the story of the team's progression from brainstorming and idea conception to prototyping and final design, documenting each iteration and step in the engineering design process . Important questions to address include:
- What prompted this change/why was this change made?
- What was the change?
- How was the modification enacted?
- What were the results (good and bad)?
- How can this design be further improved?
This also includes initial unrealized ideas discussed at the start of the season .
- Individual Sections Game Manual Part 1, Section 9.2.2, lists expected content, including:
- Problem Definition
- Information Gathering
- Brainstorming Solutions
- Concept Design
- System Level Design
- Testing
- Design Improvement
- Production
- Promotion
- Budgeting
- Planning
- Outreach
Specific sections mentioned in Game Manual Part 1, the Judges Manual, and Notebook Guidelines include a team plan, which encompasses non-robot writing such as a sustainability plan, a strategic plan, and a business plan. Completing one of these is required for the Inspire award . The specific naming and content of each section are left to the individual notebook writers .
The length and detail of the notebook should be considered based on the competition schedule; a condensed notebook is advisable for shorter competitions where judges have limited time . Humor is acceptable but should be kept to a minimum to maintain a professional-grade document . Consistent team branding is important for judges to remember and advocate for the team .