SharpAI
/

What should go in our engineering notebook?

The engineering notebook, while optional, should reflect the team's personality and branding . It should cover what needs to be included and decisions about its overall structure and individual sections .

Key elements to include in the notebook are:

  • Building Section and Documenting the Robot This section should explain how the robot fulfills the challenge and the driving factors behind its construction . It should contain information about parts and materials, pictures of every mechanism with captions, and explanations of components to illustrate design thought processes . Graphics such as CAD screenshots or real-world photos are generally preferred over high-quality renders, and each graphic must have a caption or explanation . Math should be used in explanations to target the Think award . The notebook should tell the story of the team's progression from brainstorming and idea conception to prototyping and final design, documenting each iteration and step in the engineering design process . Important questions to address include:
  • What prompted this change/why was this change made?
  • What was the change?
  • How was the modification enacted?
  • What were the results (good and bad)?
  • How can this design be further improved?

This also includes initial unrealized ideas discussed at the start of the season .

  • Individual Sections Game Manual Part 1, Section 9.2.2, lists expected content, including:
  • Problem Definition
  • Information Gathering
  • Brainstorming Solutions
  • Concept Design
  • System Level Design
  • Testing
  • Design Improvement
  • Production
  • Promotion
  • Budgeting
  • Planning
  • Outreach

Specific sections mentioned in Game Manual Part 1, the Judges Manual, and Notebook Guidelines include a team plan, which encompasses non-robot writing such as a sustainability plan, a strategic plan, and a business plan. Completing one of these is required for the Inspire award . The specific naming and content of each section are left to the individual notebook writers .

The length and detail of the notebook should be considered based on the competition schedule; a condensed notebook is advisable for shorter competitions where judges have limited time . Humor is acceptable but should be kept to a minimum to maintain a professional-grade document . Consistent team branding is important for judges to remember and advocate for the team .

Was this right?

Generated from indexed documentation and can be wrong — check the source beside each claim. Follow-ups are not saved. Unofficial, not affiliated with FIRST. Quotes Game Manual 0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) and FTC Docs (BSD 3-Clause). Built by Sharp Face Robotics.